Loading company
Built from Tennessee Valley Authority’s own filings with the SEC. Figures are as reported, with per-share history restated onto today’s share basis. This describes a business — it is not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything.
Three ratings, each a percentile against the 162 companies it is measured with. Deliberately kept apart rather than blended into one score — cheap, rising and well-run are three different facts, and a single number would hide which one is which.
Not enough data to rank
The most recent month is left out on purpose: returns tend to persist over 7–12 months and the newest one tends to reverse. This describes what the price has done, and says nothing about what it will do.
Not enough data to rank
Yields, so higher means cheaper — a loss-making company ranks last instead of dropping out. Cheap is not the same as good: a high yield is often a price that fell for a reason. All five measures available.
5 checks not reported
What management does with the money — scored on whatever the filings answer, never as a share of the total.
A description of where this company sits among its competitors, not a recommendation.
Is the business getting bigger, and does it generate real cash?
Only 3 of the 5 checks below could be answered from this company’s filings, which is too few to put it on the scale. The filings do not go back far enough for the year-on-year comparisons these checks need. Whatever did resolve is still shown — it is just not enough for a letter.
Showing 2 of 17 quarters of Tennessee Valley Authority’s grade history. The other 15 go back to September 2016.
