Loading company
UP Fintech Holding Ltd
TIGR · Nasdaq · ·
$4.55-2.3%Sep 29 close
- 1M
- -6.8%
- 6M
- -29.2%
- 1Y
- -57.1%
- 5Y
- -60.5%
UP Fintech Holding Ltd is the 40th largest of 84 graded companies. Showing 5 of them, including TIGR itself. 12 more are in this industry but have no grade yet, so they are left out rather than shown blank.
| Company | Grade | Market value | Revenue | Profit margin | Free cash flow | Price to earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJT Partners Inc.PJT | A+ | — | $1.9B | 10.6% | $661.8M | — |
| Morgan StanleyMS | A | $302.8B | $78B | 25.8% | -$18.6B | 15.59 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.GS | B | $266.8B | $66.2B | 31.7% | -$41.5B | 14.15 |
| Schwab Charles Corp.SCHW | A+ | $171.4B | $26B | 38.8% | $10.8B | 18.05 |
| UP Fintech Holding LimitedTIGR | A | $851.7M | $687.9M | 16.2% | $1.3B | 4.89 |
79 more capital markets companies
Graded on the same five checks, from their own SEC filings.
A blank price-to-earnings means a loss, not a missing figure — the ratio has no meaning when there are no earnings to divide by, and printing a negative one would make the least profitable company look the cheapest.
Grades are trailing twelve months from each company’s own SEC filings, so they move only when a company files. Every column is computed by the same code that graded UP Fintech Holding Ltd on the overview — nothing here comes from a data vendor’s own ratios.
Industry membership is not a judgement about how similar two businesses are. It groups companies by what they are classified as, which is a starting point for comparison rather than a claim that they compete.
TIGR · Nasdaq · ·
$4.55-2.3%Sep 29 close