Loading company
Lesaka Technologies, Inc.
LSAK · Nasdaq · ·
$3.320.0%Nov 13 close
Figures through September 30, 2026, from the 10-Q filed November 4, 2026
Past performance
- 1W
- -5.7%
- 1M
- -25.4%
Lesaka Technologies, Inc. against software infrastructure
Lesaka Technologies, Inc. is the 96th largest of 159 graded companies. Showing 5 of them, including LSAK itself. 17 more are in this industry but have no grade yet, so they are left out rather than shown blank.
| Company | Grade | Market value | Revenue | Profit margin | Free cash flow | Price to earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.RAMP | A+ | — | $847M | 17.4% | $166.4M | — |
| Microsoft CorporationMSFT | C+ | $3.89T | $346.4B | 41.2% | $60B | 27.34 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc.PLTR | A+ | $432.4B | $7.3B | 50.3% | $4.1B | 118.30 |
| Oracle CorporationORCL | D | $379B | $71.8B | 26.4% | -$28.7B | 19.65 |
| Lesaka Technologies, Inc.LSAK | B | $287.3M | $734.7M | 0.4% | $11.8M | 83.00 |
154 more software infrastructure companies
Graded on the same five checks, from their own SEC filings.
How it compares with its industry
Three ratings, each a percentile against the 171 companies we cover in Software Infrastructure. Deliberately kept apart rather than blended into one score — cheap, rising and well-run are three different facts, and a single number would hide which one is which.
Momentum
72of 100 in its industry
Above most of its industry
12 months to a month ago13.2%
6 months to a month ago-3.1%
The most recent month is left out on purpose: returns tend to persist over 7–12 months and the newest one tends to reverse. This describes what the price has done, and says nothing about what it will do.
Value
71of 100 in its industry
Above most of its industry
Profit for the price1.13%
Cash for the price4.11%
Sales for the price255.71%
Assets for the price71.47%
Operating profit for the whole business13.63%
Yields, so higher means cheaper — a loss-making company ranks last instead of dropping out. Cheap is not the same as good: a high yield is often a price that fell for a reason. All five measures available.
Capital allocation
3/6Loose
All six answerable
Return on capital2.0%
Shareholder yield0.12%
Share count, 3 years43.9%
Net debt / EBITDA2.55x
Insiders, 12 months+$7.9M
What management does with the money — scored on whatever the filings answer, never as a share of the total.
The six capital-allocation checks
- Return on the money invested2.0% on invested capital
- Debt against earnings2.55x net debt to operating earnings
- Cash returned to shareholdersKeeps essentially all of it
- Share count over three yearsShare count 43.9% higher over three years
- Payouts covered by cash flowFree cash flow covers what it pays out
- Open-market insider buyingNet buying of $7.9M by 2 insiders
A description of where this company sits among its competitors, not a recommendation. Ratings updated Nov 15, 2026.
A blank price-to-earnings means a loss, not a missing figure — the ratio has no meaning when there are no earnings to divide by, and printing a negative one would make the least profitable company look the cheapest.
Grades are trailing twelve months from each company’s own SEC filings, so they move only when a company files. Every column is computed by the same code that graded Lesaka Technologies, Inc. on the overview — nothing here comes from a data vendor’s own ratios.
Industry membership is not a judgement about how similar two businesses are. It groups companies by what they are classified as, which is a starting point for comparison rather than a claim that they compete.