Loading company
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
CAAS · Nasdaq · ·
$4.80-2.2%Sep 29 close
- 1M
- -3.8%
- 6M
- +14.3%
- 1Y
- +1.9%
- 5Y
- +70.8%
China Automotive Systems, Inc. is the 43rd largest of 55 graded companies. Showing 5 of them, including CAAS itself. 2 more are in this industry but have no grade yet, so they are left out rather than shown blank.
| Company | Grade | Market value | Revenue | Profit margin | Free cash flow | Price to earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Reilly Automotive Inc.ORLY | B+ | $69.6B | $18.6B | 14.3% | $2.2B | 27.31 |
| Autozone Inc.AZO | C+ | $46.9B | $18.9B | 13.2% | $1.8B | 19.85 |
| Magna International Inc.MGA | B | $18.1B | $42B | 0.1% | $2.3B | 22.02 |
| Genuine Parts Co.GPC | A | $17.5B | $25.1B | 0.1% | $759.4M | 488.29 |
| China Automotive Systems, Inc.CAAS | A | $144.8M | $765.7M | 5.6% | $74.4M | 3.38 |
50 more auto parts companies
Graded on the same five checks, from their own SEC filings.
A blank price-to-earnings means a loss, not a missing figure — the ratio has no meaning when there are no earnings to divide by, and printing a negative one would make the least profitable company look the cheapest.
Grades are trailing twelve months from each company’s own SEC filings, so they move only when a company files. Every column is computed by the same code that graded China Automotive Systems, Inc. on the overview — nothing here comes from a data vendor’s own ratios.
Industry membership is not a judgement about how similar two businesses are. It groups companies by what they are classified as, which is a starting point for comparison rather than a claim that they compete.
CAAS · Nasdaq · ·
$4.80-2.2%Sep 29 close